Twitter violation
April 15th, 2009
1 comment
Found in a search for names on Twitter, April 2009
Just one Condorman on Twitter, so there is an outside possibility that this is not a copyright violation, but a legitimate online identity. There’s no Woodrow Wilkins, so if he’s really online, he’s just using his secret identity. (There are also 34 Michael Crawfords, but I don’t think that proves anything.)